Schizophrenia and Grendel S Rituals - 1533 Words

Grendel Psychological Profile There is a stage in everyone’s life where they feel they are not accepted by someone or something. Whether it is because of one’s age, appearance, or emotional and mental stability, a sense of disproval and isolation appears to be glaring through the eyes of society. Throughout Grendel’s life, he is shunned from humanity for he was viewed as something of destruction and harm. However, not one person ever took the time out to see Grendel’s true personality or really discover what he was all about. When facing the realities of the cruel world, Grendel found himself severely struggling with some psychological deficiencies. After performing multiple psychoanalysis tests on Grendel’s behavior, his†¦show more content†¦People with schizophrenia often cannot control their thoughts; they jump from one topic to the next and can never make a comprehensible decision. They often feel as if people are listening to their thought process and controlling w hat they think. Grendel conveyed this multiple times throughout his lifetime. He often would be completely indecisive over whom he would murder and how he would commit the crime. â€Å"I would kill her and teach them reality. Grendel the truth-teacher, phantasm-tester! It was what I would be from this day forward-my commitment, my character as long as I lived-and nothing alive or dead could change my mind! I changed my mind. It would be meaningless, killing her.† (pg 110) Like many whom suffer the same disorder, Grendel completely changed his mind, extending from one topic to the exact opposite. He goes against his own ideas as if he were two totally opposing characters. He also always thought the dragon was near. Grendel allowed the ways and beliefs of the dragon to get in his head. He would claim he could â€Å"smell the dragon’s scent† whenever something sinister occurred. All of these symptoms, in addition to the isolation from Hrothgar’s people lead to the overall cause in withdrawal from society. Grendel’s emotional disturbances caused him to react completely unreasonable and rather foolish many times within his life. Having that I studied Grendel’s rituals, emotions, and responses

Wal Mart Leadership And Management Strategies - 1822 Words

The leaders at Walmart have been very successful in exhibiting leadership in the company taking the company to new heights â€Å"Wal-Mart, the largest retail store of the United States, the Wal-Mart leadership and management strategies contribute to the core success†, during the 1980s, widespread growth was observed due to the diversification of the company and â€Å"the leadership style of Harold Lee Scott, CEO of Walmart is inherited from the business legacy of Sam Walton, founder of Walmart.† Walmart store managers started by working at the register or in some entry-level position and through an ongoing process they eventually would work their way up to become a store manager which took about seven to eleven years, an assessment test†¦show more content†¦Visionary leadership is necessary to build a company visionary leaders are the ones who provide direction to the company and set the goals that everyone seeks to achieve for the company and Walmartâ€℠¢s vision is to provide good customer service and merchandise at the lowest possible price â€Å"to help people save money so they can live better†. Ethical leadership is leading with dignity and respecting the rights of others and the leaders of Walmart stress the importance of employee satisfaction because when you have satisfied employees then you will in return have happy customers. Also strategic leadership this is what manages, motivates and persuades employees to share the company vision and a good strategy is the success factor behind a good company, Walmart uses strategic leadership in a form of sharing through empowerment mechanisms such as delegation and also participation, Walmart is such a big company that it has to be shared responsibilities so Walmart gives autonomy to several positions from leaders to retail store management. When it comes to decision making Walmart believes that â€Å"tough decision making capabilities of the organizational leadership are significant in the organizational success† (â€Å"Researchomatic†). Decision-making responsibility, at all levels, permits minor issues to be understood by the individuals who are first mindful of them and leaders can remain concentrated on issues that has to do with the goal of the companyShow MoreRelatedWalmart Management and Leadership Analysis Essay1472 Words   |  6 PagesWal-Mart Management and Leadership Analysis XXXXXXXXXXX Organizational Behavior and Group Dynamics/Mgt 330 November 11, 2009 Ronald Sprague Wal-Mart Management and Leadership Analysis Wal-Mart is arguably the most dynamic corporation in the last 50 years in the United States, if not the world. Arising from its beginnings in Bentonville, Arkansas, it has grown to over 4,400 discount stores, super centers and corner markets worldwide. Wal-Mart continues to expand despite publicRead MoreWal Mart s Forces Structure Essay920 Words   |  4 PagesWith regards to Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Porter s five forces structure can be utilized to examine the intensity of Wal-Mart s industry. Wal-Mart’s changed from a little chain of markdown stores to the world’s biggest retailer. Wal-Mart’s transformation from a small chain of discount stores in Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma in 1970 to the world’s largest retailer was one of the most remarkable corporate success stories of the 20th century (Grant, 2008, p.57). Wal-Mart works in the retail businessRead MoreWalmart Competitive Analysis1136 Words   |  5 Pages | |[Wal-mart case analysis] | |Competitive advantage and competitive dynamics | What might explain Wal-Mart’s performance overRead MoreSwot Analysis of Wal-Mart and Carrefour952 Words   |  4 PagesSusan Donoho Argosy University SWOT Analysis of Wal-mart and Carrefour SWOT Analysis for Wal-Mart and Carrefour What is a hypermarket? According to Business Dictionary that is an online business definition resource, it is a â€Å"vast self-service warehouse-cum-retail outlet that combines the features of a supermarket, department store, discount store, and specialty store in one location.† A hypermarket may also be called a hyper-mart (Business Dictionary, 2012). The multinational retailers thatRead MoreWal Mart For My Hospitality Analysis1496 Words   |  6 Pageschosen Wal-Mart for my hospitality analysis. Wal-Mart was founded in 1945, with it s headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas. Wal-Mart is known for their variety and discounts in the industry. Along with operating worldwide as of January 31, 2006, they also have 1980 superstores, 567 Sam s Clubs, and 1209 discount stores. They have also extended their operations into the international countries. There are two forms that they run their retail: Wal-Mart Stores, and Sam s Club. The Wal-Mart storesRead MoreWal-Mart Case Study E ssays871 Words   |  4 PagesWAL-MART CASE STUDY WAL-MART CASE ANALYSIS Impressions Wal-Mart is a company that leads its industry in numerous areas. The areas which impress are the accomplishments the company has made. â€Å"About 140 million people in 11 countries shopped at Wal-Mart †¦every week. More than half of American shoppers visited Wal-Mart at least once a month†¦an estimated 82 percent at American households have made at least one purchase at Wal-Mart† (Bianco, Zellner, 2003). Less impressive is the company being involvedRead MoreWal-Marts Sustainable Competitive Advantage Essay1093 Words   |  5 Pagesvalue by providing distinct products and sustain its position against its competitors. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is one of such companies in the retail sector that has achieved sustainable competitive advantage over a period of time.  ¬This report focuses on how Wal-Mart has achieved competitive advantage by adopting cost leadership strategy and providing consumer goods at lower prices. The report also discusses how Wal-Mart is taking lead on environmental sustainability by investing in solar power plants,Read MoreEssay on Wal-Mart Analysis1677 Words   |  7 PagesArkansas, Wal-Mart has become the leader in the discount department store industry. Through its stores, Supercenters and Sam’s Club warehouse stores, the company operates 2,823 units in the United States, 606 units in six foreign countries, and has 7 joint ventures in the Pacific Rim. Ten strategies have been identified that will ensure continued revenue and market share growth via foreign expansion, the foray into new domestic markets (the urban market) and concentration strategies in existingRead MoreWal Mart : An American Multinational Retail Corporation1738 Words   |  7 PagesCompany Overview Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., popularly known as Wal-Mart, is an American multinational retail corporation that runs chains of large discount department stores and warehouse stores. Wal-Mart has been ranked as number 1 in the list of Fortune 500 companies for 2013. (CNN money, 2013) The company was founded by Sam Walton in 1962, incorporated on October 31, 1969 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It is headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas, United States. It is also the largestRead MoreThe Difference Of Organizational Structure Between Google And Wal Mart951 Words   |  4 Pagesdepends on the organization s objectives and strategy. In a very centralized structure, the highest layer of management has most of the choice creating power and has tight management over departments and divisions. In a much suburbanized structure, the choice creating power is distributed and also the departments and divisions could have totally different degrees of independence. Wal-mart’s struct ure is built upon its risk management, safety and claims management process. Google Inc. has gained much attention

Boeing/Airbus Evaluation Free Essays

MBA 654 Case 10. 1 Boeing Airbus Robin Grouette 1. The overall strategy for Boeing seems to be focused more on customization and efficiency rather than size. We will write a custom essay sample on Boeing/Airbus Evaluation or any similar topic only for you Order Now With the focus of the 787 Dreamliner being that of long range with smaller passenger capacity, Boeing is anticipating that more direct routes to international cities will be developed rather than the typical hub and spoke routes which currently dominate the airline industry. Airbus’ overall strategy is focused more on the hub and spoke routes as well as improving efficiency. The A380 has utilized new materials in both airframe and wing compositions which have not been seen in Boeing’s products. The A380 also relies heavily on travel between concentrated hubs of passengers to ensure capacity is not underutilized. Airbus does seem to be playing a bit of catch-up in announcing the A350 for a 2012 release as it is positioned to compete directly with the 787 from Boeing. The ways in which both strategies are different would be the focus of Airbus on centralized hub and spoke routes for airlines (major city to major city) and creating larger aircraft to support their strategy, as compared to the decentralized connectivity to international destinations (smaller cities connected to smaller cities) which Boeing believes to be the coming evolution of air travel. The similarities in both strategies focus around efficiency and range. Almost the entirety of both new product developments for both companies have seen significant increases in flying distance in comparison to previous models. Also, with the rising cost of fuel, the efficiency of design and materials has been become more important. Airbus has developed its product line in response to the strengths and weaknesses shown by Boeing. An example would be the A320 family which was introduced 20 years following the 727/737 models from Boeing. All models involve smaller capacities and ranges which would suit regional and national travel. Airbus also developed a medium range/capacity A300/310 model to compete with the 757 and 787 from Boeing. In both the small range/capacity and medium range/capacity, Boeing had a long established dominance in model acceptance as well as an ability to provide upgrades in technology and efficiency at a smaller cost to replacing the entire plane, which left Airbus at a disadvantage. Where Airbus’ real advantage came in the long range/large capacity segment which had only been serviced by the 747 from Boeing. With the introduction of the A330/340 in the late ‘80’s as well as the A380 in 2008, Airbus is anticipating the need for long distance, major hub connections throughout the world rather than having smaller cities having the ability to have direct flights to international destinations . 2. The product lines for both companies fall into three categories: short range/small capacity, medium range/medium capacity, long range/large capacity. Both companies have four models in the short range/capacity segment, Airbus has 2 models in the medium range/capacity segment to Boeing’s 3, and Airbus has 2 models in the long range/large capacity to Boeing’s 1. The sales for each segment is dominated largely by Boeing with 9632 units sold between 1970 and 2005 in comparison to the 5797 that Airbus sold in the same time. While being dominated in the small and medium segments, Airbus has been exceeding Boeing in the long range segment since the 90’s. In terms of technology, both firms are making advances towards efficiency as well as fly-by-wire controls. While Boeing models have been established for quite some time, Airbus has utilized their late entry into the industry by incorporating the latest technology into their products. Aircraft were originally designed with direct mechanical systems, meaning that when the pilot depressed a pedal in the cockpit, the corresponding surface on the airplane would react by how hard/fast the pedal was depressed. In modern aircraft, this mechanical system has been replaced by a fly-by-wire system which an electrical signal is sent to the surface from the cockpit, rather than a mechanical one. Airbus has been utilizing this technology exclusively in their products, whereas Boeing has had to create upgrade packages for their existing products to switch to the new technology. Airbus has made a leap in material component technology which Boeing has not, in the Lithium/Aluminum body composition as well as carbon fiber wing construction for the new A380. Overall I believe that the Boeing approach to a more decentralized, medium capacity aircraft with long range and high efficiency will prove to be the better product line. Airlines are creating more direct flights to international destinations and having the ability to have a larger percentage of capacity utilized on the medium capacity planes will make the 787 more desirable to airlines as they continue to evolve. 4. The overall economics of the industry is one of stiff competition supporting an industry which has been struggling to make a profit for the last decade. Both companies are competing for the limited capital available to their customers to provide new products while at the same time, staying current with evolving regulations around noise and efficiency. Also, both companies are competing on a wide variety of factors for all three sales segments so creation of new products to meet customer needs are both costly as well as risky. The importance of government subsidies for both companies is paramount. This helps transfer the financial risk of new product development across more participants. While Airbus gets directly subsidized from a number of European governments, Boeing is indirectly subsidized through their military contract business. Boeing’s issue with the direct subsidies are that they can be directly traced to the commercial aircraft industry while their indirect military subsidies are harder to uncover. In the end, both companies are being subsidized by government funds. While the level of subsidization may not be exactly the same for both companies, making an issue about the only other competitor in the industry receiving a subsidy while you are as well comes across as a double standard. 5. New products are developed by creating very long range forecasts and anticipating the evolving needs of their customers before they may even realize them; all at a tremendous RD cost to the developing company. While most of Boeing’s products were developed in the 60’s and 70’s, they really hadn’t come out with anything new until 2006 and then again in 2010; whereas Airbus has had a more consistent release of new products since the 80’s. The major trade-off between fuel efficiency and cost are based on the ability to upgrade existing models over the improved technology and materials in the newer models. Since Boeing has had an established product line for a longer time than Airbus, they are able to compete by selling upgrade packages to improve technology and fuel efficiency rather than having to replace the entire plane. While this has worked for Boeing in the past, this approach may have stagnated the creative drive of designers in coming up with new models, which Airbus has been doing. The A380 may not be a serious threat to Boeing, depending on how the global airline industry adapts to more people flying. If the hub and spoke method which is currently employed persists well into the future, then Boeing could be at a disadvantage to Airbus as their large capacity 747 is almost 50 years old and there are no current plans to replace it. On the other hand, if airlines start offering more direct flights from a wider variety of cities, the 787 Dreamliner is excellently positioned to take advantage of both longer ranges as well as smaller passenger requirements for profitability. 6. There will be new competitors entering this industry either directly or indirectly. Direct competition could be developed in Asia as more and more people use air travel as well as an increase in skilled labour. Indirect competition could also evolve from privatized space travel. While currently only found in science fiction, the ability for aircraft to travel semi ballistic is not far off. Having the ability to travel tremendous distances at greatly reduced times would be a major draw to people who use airlines for international business. Boeing needs to be aware of the progress of the privatized space flight industry as well as any potential competition from Asia. This means more investment into technology around fuel efficiency as well as materials and systems. When Boeing offered upgrades on their 747, they reduced the total crew required from 3 to 2, saving $400,000 per year in operating costs. If they could further reduce crew requirements to a single pilot, it would provide significant operational savings to their customers. The future of the commercial aircraft industry is bright. Air travel is the safest and fastest way for people to travel long distances. With evolutions in engine and plane design, the models will only get faster and more efficient. The key for each company is to not wait to see what the other is doing, but to invest in both market research and technology to stay ahead of the other. How to cite Boeing/Airbus Evaluation, Papers