Cog. Psyc wk2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Cog. Psyc wk2 - Essay ExampleList the actors that influence attention when per stageing this task and why they atomic number 18 of influence. There will be several factors which will influence an unmarried undertaking writing and reading at the same while. The first of these is how effectively an individual can divide his conscious attention between these two demanding tasks (Spelke, Hirst & Neisser, 1976). This factor greatly influences the multitasking ability of an individual as it is central to his ability to perform. Another factor in terms of dual-task interference results because of the presence of a sensation channel bottleneck which will frequently cause a delay in the response. This influences the individuals military operation because supposing we ask them a question while they are performing it will lead to a possible pause, delay or error in their unravel as they strive to respond to your question (Mei-Ching, Ruthruff, and Johnston). In terms of attention the locu s of this bottleneck (asking a question) in a persons instruction processing system can either translate into a perceptual limitation ( it takes them time to formulate a response) or response limitation ( it delays the time it takes for them to respond or they respond in a limited way by nodding or shaking their head). Then, describe three things that can be done to increase attention when engaged in the situation. The first thing that can be done to increase attention when engaged in multi tasking is by practicing the tasks in a routine. Because the brain cannot fully focus when multitasking, people take longer to complete tasks and are predisposed to error. The essence of multi tasking through practice then unconsciously induces an element of becoming automatized in their behavior. That is, when people attempt to complete many tasks at one time they are in fact cursorily going between them (Meyer 2003). Second by extensive undertaking of the task one can bypass the central bottl eneck (distracters). Studies by Spelke, Hirst, and Neisser (1976) prove that payable to the formulation of a pattern in their reading while accurately transcribing spoken words subjects were able to clump the activity as if it were a single unit. Take driving for example by the formulation of a pattern (driving the car) the individual reaches a level of automatization which enables him to multi task (drive as well at by chance talk on the phone). Initially for a new driver the nerve of driving itself was the combination of a number of processes (shifting gears, using the brakes etc) (like a copulative assay) until through practice he was able to see it as one unit ( kind of like a feature search). This brings us to the third aspect of the visual-search ?ndings which aim to increase attention by suggesting that certain perceptual processes can operate in parallel after practice (Spelke et al, 1976). An implantation of this visual search aspect strives to improve our ability to m ultitask by utilizing the aspect of task familiarity. References Mei-Ching, Ruthruff, and Johnston. Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at Once. Oregon State University, University of New Mexico, and NASA Ames Research Centre. Retrieved form http//www.unm.edu/ruthruff/Lien%20Ruthruff%20Johnston%20CDPS%202006.pdf Spelke, Hirst & Neisser. 1976. Learning to Multitask. Retrieved from